Wednesday, January 16, 2019

516 Field Observation


Week 2 Field Observation
Jessica Kuiper
Professor Dickenson
11 January 2019


PRE-OBSERVATION
            For this assignment, I had the pleasure of observing Mrs. Kuiper’s 6th grade class at Pinon Mesa Middle School. Mrs. Kuiper has been a dedicated teacher for 11 years within the Snowline School District. The demographics of this district fall under in the low income spectrum, and there are several homeless students within the district. These demographics contribute to the low socio-economical standing of students, and there are many students on behavioral contracts at Pinon Mesa. Teaching new material may not always be the main focus in the class, as offering emotional support/service and creating a positive, safe learning environment becomes more important. During my observation, I could clearly see Mrs. Kuiper reassuring students that their best work was exceptional and continually motivating students to keep trying. Students felt safe to ask questions, and check their understanding on the assignment, and Mrs. Kuiper diligently monitored the classroom for safe behavior.
OBSERVATION
            On this day, there were 19 students present. There were 7 girls and 12 boys in the class. Students came in, and sat in a seat of their choosing, with several large tables filling the room.
            Mrs. Kuiper first had students watch a five minute video introducing the topic of the day, the metric system. When the video finished, Mrs. Kuiper led a discussion reviewing the material, and connected student’s prior knowledge. Mrs. Kuiper asked if students knew what centi-, milli-, and deci- meant, and if students had used a measuring tape before. Mrs. Kuiper explained that for this assignment, students will go outside, and measure their longest leap. Students gathered in groups of 3, working together to tape down one measuring tape per group. Each group then took turns jumping as far as they could, and marked each other’s jump, with a piece of chalk. After 10 minutes, students were told to record their longest jump measured. This number was used to complete the first two sections of the worksheet (the class will finish the worksheet on Monday.) Mrs. Kuiper walked students through the first two questions of the worksheet, prompting students to think critically to find their answers. Students raised hands to share their answers, and discussed how to fix their errors. The two completed sections of the worksheet were used as exit tickets, so that Mrs. Kuiper could analysis the comprehension level of the material for each student.
            There were several instances in which Mrs. Kuiper used the highlighted math practices on our class’s handout. Concepts 7 and 8 were used in this activity: student were shown that each metric unit can either be divided or multiplied by 10, and were given an opportunity to independently work. Students were shown metric structure, and were able to develop shortcuts for the metric system. Concepts 4 and 5 were also used in the lesson: students were given several metric system guidelines handouts, which aided the students while completing the worksheet, and engaged prior knowledge in reading the numbers on the measuring tape, as well as multiplying and dividing numbers. Students analyzed given information (concept 1) and self-assessed answers to check for understanding. During the class discussion, concept 3 was present, as students listened to thoughts and arguments of each other, decided if the answered made sense, and corrected any errors. Concepts 6 was present in that the metric system was the entirety of the lesson, giving students the opportunity to use measuring tapes, and record their results. Lastly, students were asked to consider the metric units used, and think qualitatively about their answers (concept 2.) Overall, this lesson plan engaged students in relevant mathematical practices for 6th grade.
POST OBSERVATION
            Mrs. Kuiper’s lesson plan was detailed, organized, and well-thought out. However, the class was antsy with anticipation in the outside portion of the activity. As this was Mrs. Kuiper’s first time preparing this activity, she mentioned in the future, she will have selected students organize the measuring tapes ahead of time. For the worksheet portion of the activity, students were confused on where to stop for the day, and subsequently filled the entire worksheet out without direction. In the future, Mrs. Kuiper would benefit from displaying the worksheet on the overhead/projector, and working the problems out together with the students.
            Overall, the instruction and class activity ran smoothly, and there were few kinks that need to be improved on in the future. The class was well behaved for the post part, and many students were attentively waiting for instruction. Mrs. Kuiper’s lesson plan clearly detailed many mathematical practices, and stated the Common Core Standards that were used for the day. As a future teacher, I feel more confident in my ability to develop and deliver mathematical lesson plans.

Monday, December 3, 2018

ITL 514- Signature Assignment


Individual Assessment, Analysis, and Planning Project
Professor Albertoni
ITL 514
Jessica Kuiper
1 December 2018


LINKS TO YOUTUBE VIDEOS

BACKGROUND HISTORY: LEARNER
            For this assignment, I will be focusing on a 3rd grade student at Bradach Elementary School, whose name is Nick. Nick is one of four children; he has one older brother, one younger brother, and the youngest sibling is a newborn sister. Each sibling attends a different school district. Nick’s primary care giver is his father, and Nick visits his mother on a non-regular basis. Nick’s siblings are primarily with his mother, and visit Nick’s father on the weekends. Nick’s mother and father are no longer together, and it has been noted that this has affected Nick’s emotional and mental health. Nick’s father works varying hours, and Nick’s homework is not always completed on time, or at all. Nick’s first language is English, and he does not know any other languages. In the house, only English is spoken. Nick has attended Bradach Elementary since Kindergarten, and has repeated Kindergarten. Nick performs best with a male educator, and struggles with authority with female teachers. Nick has been known to throw tantrums in the classroom, and can be disobedient if he does not understand or relate to the assignment. However, Nick’s behavior has improved this school year, and receives mostly “O’s” (outstanding) on his behavior chart for the day. I will be administering a series of assessments one-on-one with Nick to see where his reading fluency, comprehension and spelling stands, I will then analyze these results, and create a plan of intervention, if necessary.
ASSESSMENTS TO BE ADMINISTERED
            In order to assess Nick’s reading ability and comprehension level, I will be giving him a series of different assessments. The first test is the Oral Reading Fluency, which will gauge Nick’s reading fluency rate. He will be given several short passages to read for one minute each. I will record how many words in the story Nick reads, and subtract the amount of errors. The remaining number will be decide Nick’s fluency rate (words correct per minute.) Once he is done reading the passage, I will ask him a question regarding the story, which will show how well Nick understood the story (comprehension.) The ORF test is an excellent way to see Nick’s reading fluency rate, as well as monitoring Nick’s comprehension of what he reads. The next test I will give Nick is called the Names Test. This test checks Nick’s phonemic awareness, and gauges how well Nick can segment Names, and blends them together. I will be able to see Nick’s strengths and weaknesses with phonemic awareness, and begin to create an intervention plan. The third test is the San Diego Quick reading Assessment, which will identify Nick’s independent, instructional and frustration reading levels, and will also let me know if Nick recognizes any sight words, or grade level vocabulary. I will also be able to see the strengths and weaknesses in Nick’s decoding strategies. This test will be helpful in determining if Nick is below or above the 2nd grade reading level, and will also help me to see where Nick is struggling with decoding. The fourth test I will be giving is the Student Reading/Writing interview. This interview will ask Nick questions about his knowledge of what reading/writing is, and if he enjoys reading/writing. Nick will be answering these questions himself, by writing the answers to the questions.  This assessment will be beneficial, because I will be able to see Nick’s attitude towards reading/writing, and how well he understands what a good reader/writer consist of. I will have a better understanding of whom nick considers to be a good reader/writer, and if he believes he falls into either category. Lastly, I will be able to see how well Nick is able to writing complete sentences, his knowledge of punctuation, and if he is able to communicate through written word.  The fifth assessment is the Elementary Reading Attitude Survey, which asks 20 different questions regarding Nick’s attitude towards reading at home and at school. This is the perfect tool for seeing how Nick feels about reading at home or at school. If he is uninterested in reading, I can ask follow up questions to see why, and if he is interested in reading, and I can get to know more about why he enjoys reading, and what type of books he likes to read. This is a great way to see Nick’s true attitude towards reading, and gives me a chance to create an intervention plan if necessary. The sixth assessment I will be giving is called the Yopp-Singer Test of Phonemic Segmentation. This test will look at how well Nick is able to segment and blend individual sounds into words. This assessment will show me where Nick is have difficulty with segmenting and blending, as well as being able to decode unfamiliar words. I will also be able to see if Nick recognizes grade level vocabulary, along with sight words. From the information I gather, I can create a plan of action to help Nick will areas in which he struggles, and improve his overall ability to segment and blend sounds into words. The final test I will give Nick is called the Elementary Spelling Inventory. I will be giving Nick a spelling test of 25 words, which incrementally increase in difficulty. When/if Nick misspells a word, I will be able to analyze the mistake and create an area of focus. The Spelling Inventory categorizes the sounds, patterns, affixes, and derivational relations found in the word, and each area has it’s own score. The lowest scores that Nick receives will be where focus is needed most; in order to increase Nick’s overall spelling ability. These seven assessments will help me understand the strengths and weaknesses in Nick’s fluency, decoding skills, spelling, and comprehension, and I will be able to create an intervention plan tailored to Nick’s most necessary needs.
ASSESSMENT RESULTS
            Overall, Nick did fairly well on the 7 assessments that were given to him. In order to maintain Nick’s focus, the assessments were broken into segments, in which a total of 3 videos were recorded. For the Student Reading/Writing Interview, I wrote the answers that Nick gave me, after I read the questions out loud. For this assessment, Nick did not answer in complete sentences, and stated that he felt “mad” about reading. The results from this assessment show that Nick understands why people read, and what makes a good reader, however, this supports his lack of motivation to read. For Nick’s Elementary Reading Attitude Survey, Nick scored 17 in recreational reading and 23 in academic reading. He most answers, he either answered with a mildly upset Garfield, or a very upset Garfield. In questions 13-20, Nick began answering questions with multiple feelings, which shows when Nick became uninterested in the assessment. For these questions, I used the emotion that Nick originally circled. These results show Nick’s lack of motivation to read, and lack of love of reading. Nick does not enjoy reading at home, but enjoys reading at school. He would rather play video games or with his friends, than spending time reading a book. In the Spelling Inventory, Nick missed 13 of 15 words that were given to him. Nick correctly spelled “bed” and “when.”  Nick had trouble with multisyllable words, long vowels, and word endings (-en instead of –ing.) Nick also struggled with diagraphs, confusing “ch” with “sh” and “ch” with “th.” In the San Diego Quick Reading Assessment, results show that Nick’s independent level was grade 1, his instructional level was grade 2, and his frustration level was grade 3. These results show that Nick is slightly behind grade level in decoding skills needed for vocabulary recognition and phonic skills. In the Names Test, Nick paused while pronouncing most of the first names, and did not attempt to pronounce the last names. He was unable to pronounce a good majority of the first names, and quickly read through the names, skipping the ones he did not know. These results show that Nick does not have strong decoding skills, and that he is reading too quickly, and not taking his time with words he is unfamiliar with. In the Oral Reading Fluency test, Nick attempted to read 58 words, with 4 errors, totally 58 wcpm. The recommended wcpm by the end of 3rd grade is 114, showing that Nick is far behind the average 3rd grade reader. In this assessment, Nick skipped over words he was unsure of, and did not attempt to sound out or decode. Nick read speedily through the passage, with little comprehension of what he had just read. Lastly, in the Yopp-Singer assessment, Nick 20/22 words correct. These results show that when Nick is cued to break down words and segment, he is able to identify individual sounds in the words. He was also able to piece the sounds together and say the word. This shows that Nick has a strong grasp of phonemic awareness, but does not apply this knowledge in words he does not understand. From these assessments, I’ve gathered that Nick struggles with reading, and reads quickly through material, skipping over words he is unaware of. This is affecting his reading fluency, writing, vocabulary, and spelling skills. It has also impacted his comprehension of material, as he is spending more time decoding, instead of understanding what he is reading. Nick will continue to fall further behind grade level if an intervention plan is not created to aid Nick’s areas of weakness.
ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS
            After reviewing these assessments, there are several strengths and weaknesses that can be seen in Nick’s test results. First, one of Nick’s strengths came from the Yopp-Singer Assessment; Nick was able to segment 20/22 words correctly. Nick was also able to blend the sounds together to pronounce the word. Nick was also able to identify what he should do if he sees a word is does not know while reading, as shown in the Student Reading/Writing Interview. Nick has several weaknesses in his reading, after reviewing his assessment scores. In the Oral Reading Fluency assessment, Nick scored 54 wcpm, which shows he is below grade level in fluency, and was also unable to recall information from the passage. His inability to read fluency stems from being unable to automatically recognize words. In his Spelling Inventory, Nick struggled with long vowels, mulitsyllable words, and diagraphs. Lastly, in Nick’s San Diego Quick Reading Assessment, his independent reading level was grade 2, with grade 3 being his instructional level, which shows he is slightly below grade level reading.
PROPOSED GOALS
            In order to improve Nick’s areas of weaknesses, there are several goals that Nick should work toward achieving. Nick’s comprehension level will improve when he is able to focus on understanding the material, instead of decoding words. I would have Nick practice segmenting and blending multisyllable words one spelling list at a time. Nick will become more familiar with words, and become a more fluent reader, as well. To motivate Nick to read in and out of the classroom, I would find books that he enjoys reading, that way reading is less of a “chore” and more of a reward. To improve Nick’s spelling, I would create word sorts for Nick to complete, focusing on diagraphs, long vowels, and multisyllable words. I believe with these teaching strategies, Nick will be able to meet the goals listed above.
REFLECTION
            After reflecting upon the assessments given, as well as the video recoding of myself, I can see there are multiple areas in which I can improve on. This was my first experience testing a student and administering assessments. In the future, I need to take more time to review the material before giving the assessments, so I am more aware of how the process works. I also need to take more time to explain the assessment to the student, so they are aware of how to complete the test, and can perform comfortably. I believe I did a good job of reading questions to Nick, and felt that he understood what was being asked. After coaching Nick on the Student Reading/Writing Assessment, he knew how to answer the questions, so I believe that is a strength I had, as well. The analysis portion was difficult, in the sense that I had to create a plan of action to improve Nick’s weaknesses, as well as identify what Nick’s weaknesses were. In the future, I would like to observe/watch assessments being given, so I can see how to properly administer assessments, as well as analyze the results. This is a skill that I know I will continue to improve upon with the more practice I have. For my first time administering assessments, I am impressed with the results I was able to identify, analyze, and plan for improvement.




Monday, November 26, 2018

ITL 514 Self-Assessment


INTRODUCTION   
After completing the self-assessment for vocabulary terms, I believe I have a good general understanding of concepts and vocabulary used in the RICA exam. I have taken the RICA once before in October, and missed the passing score by 9 points. Since then, I have studied using the Cliff Notes version of the RICA study guide, as well as the CTC’s practice version of the exam. Most recently, I’ve been using different Quizlet study guides to refresh myself with terminology used on the test. I am retaking the exam in January, and was excited to learn that this course relates to the RICA, and that we will be completing assignments similar to a case study, as that was one of my weaknesses on the previous exam.
DOMAIN 1
            In regards to domain 1 of the exam, planning, organizing, and managing reading instruction, I think I was able to define and identify the terms relatively well. Words that I struggled with were anecdotal records and implicit instruction. A book I could use to help me study for these concepts would be Phonics They Use by Cunningham, chapter 11. This chapter discusses assessment and coaching, which would coincide with domain 1. Another book that would be beneficial for review would be Ready for RICA by Zarrillo, which would go over all domains and offer a review before I retake the test.
DOMAIN 2
            Domain 2 covers word analysis, and this is the domain I had the most trouble defining words for. Other than the Cliff Notes RICA review I’ve been practicing, I have not spent time studying word analysis. The words I was unable to define were: closed syllables, consonant substitution, conventional spelling, directionality, Dolch words, Elkonin boxes, graphophonic cues, implicit instruction, initial position, listening comprehension level, miscue analysis, open syllables, saccade, schemata, syntactic cue, systematic instruction, The Names Test, nifty thrifty fifty, and vowel diagraph. Books I could use to help me learn these words in depth would be How the Brain Learns to Read by Sousa: chapter 5. This chapter discusses complications with reading that students could have, which would be why they are unable to decode and recognize words. I could also use Phonics They Use by Cunningham, chapter 11 and chapter 16 for coaching students on how to decode words, and become more familiar with new words. Lastly, the most helpful book I can use for review would be Words Their Way by Bear, chapter 1-3 because these chapters discuss word knowledge in a developmental stage. This is the domain I will need to spend the most time reviewing and studying for, as I did not feel confident in my short response answers for this domain.
DOMAIN 3
            Domain 3 is fluency, which is the domain I believe I’m the most familiar with. This is the domain I have been able to work with the most in my course work, along with each day I substitute teach. In this area, if I continue to review reading material from the Cliff Notes books, along with Ready for RICA by Zarrillo, I am confident I will be able to receive a passing score in this domain.
DOMAIN 4
            Domain 4 relates to vocabulary on the RICA. In the given list of words, there were not many words I felt fell into this category. I am aware of word walls, word sorts, and other word games I can use with students to improve their vocabulary. I also know students benefit from writing their own definition of a word, along with a visual representation of the word. This helps students remember new vocabulary, and can be converted to long-term memory. I believe if I review domain 4 in Ready for Rica by Zarrillo, along with the Cliff Notes version of the Rica study guide, I will be well prepared for the test.
DOMAIN 5
            The last domain covered is comprehension. For this domain, I missed “listening comprehension level.” I would say this is an area I need to review as well, because I didn’t feel confident in my short answer to the comprehension domain on the last RICA I took. To review for this domain, I would focus on the early chapters in How the Brain Learns to Read by Sousa, because they chapters discuss the fundamentals of reading. If the student isn’t fluently reading, they won’t be able to comprehend what they are reading. I would also study the book by Zarrillo,  “Ready for Rica” by focusing on the comprehension domain of the book. The Cliff Notes book I have been studying has gone in depth into comprehension strategies to use with students to improve their overall understanding of what they are reading.
CONCLUSION
            Overall, I feel fairly confident that I will pass the RICA this time around. I believe this course will be beneficial in the sense that I will be able to get more practice with real-life case studies, and will become more comfortable recognizing strengths, weaknesses, and strategies for improvement (which will greatly help me on the test.) Reading the noted chapters and books above will also be great study tools to help prepare me to ace my upcoming exam.


Thursday, November 15, 2018

ITL 512 Reflection Video



ITL 512 Learning Map Part 3


Teacher: _______Ms. Kuiper______________________________________                                        
Grade: ______________________6th_________________________
CCSS Standard: _____CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RF.5.3


STAGE 3: ANALYZING/REFLECTING
What evidence of student learning have you collected?

I collected the Roots, Prefixes and Suffixes worksheet that we had worked on in small and whole group settings. I also collected the exit ticket at the door to see what students had learned from the lesson.

How will you analyze this evidence?

I reviewed the answers students wrote in comparison to what we went over in class. I also reviewed what students wrote for their exit tickets, which was something ne they learned from the lesson.


What instructional decisions can you make as a result of your analysis of the evidence?

Overall, the class did well on the worksheet, and had various answers for what they learned from the lesson. In the future, I need to use more visual aids to help students, along with more kinesthetic aids for students to use. This will help students remained focused, and ensure students have an inclusive learning environment.


STAGE 4: APPLYING
My Personal Reflection:
What new information did I get about my students in relation to their learning preferences?

The students in Mrs. Kuiper’s class benefited from visual aids. After reviewing the worksheet I collected, most students missed answers I gave verbally, but wrote the correct answers for the ones I wrote on the board. Towards the end of class, students started to get antsy, and a few students said they were bored with the assignment.

How will I use this information to plan my future instruction?

In the future, I will use more visual and kinesthetic teaching aids in the classroom to maintain focus, and ensure each student understands the material. I will also give students ‘brain breaks’ so they are not overwhelmed with the material, and remain engaged in the lesson.

How effective were my practices? What will I keep, what will I improve and what will I discard?

My lesson was strong in the sense that I kept students engaged in the class; students were paying attention and focused. I need to improve with visual, kinesthetic and auditory aids for students so each type of learner is able to express themselves during the lesson.

What new understanding do I have about my own teaching practices?

After watching the recording of the lesson, I saw that I mainly used auditory components to incorporate into my lesson. This is something I will need to work on in the future. Overall, I believe my lesson was strong and students enjoyed what I had planned

What have I learned about myself as a teacher?

I was confident in myself during the lesson, but I still struggle breaking the ice with students in the beginning of the class. This is something I will continue to work on in future lessons. I was comfortable with my stage presence, and enjoyed my lesson.

As a professional learner, where do I need to continue to grow and strive for?

I will continue to incorporate a variety of teaching strategies into my lessons, and strive to meet the needs of each type of learner in the classroom. I need to incorporate more visual aids in my lessons, and include kinesthetic units for students, as well. As a learner, I need to research different classroom management styles, to create the most inclusive learning environment for my students.